Benchmark - Curriculum Development Issue Paper

Benchmark - Curriculum Development Issue Paper

Details:

Read "Reconceptualizing Program Outcomes" and "Leveling EBP Content for Undergraduate Nursing Students" for a better understanding of issues within curriculum development.

Select an issue within curriculum development that is of interest to you.Benchmark - Curriculum Development Issue Paper

Write a paper of 1,000-1,250 words on the issue, discussing its affect and relevance to nursing, staff or patient education.

  1. Why is this issue a problem at your place of employment?
  2. What are your proposed strategies to resolve these issues?
  3. Use at least three to five scholarly, peer-reviewed resources less than 5 years old in addition to the course materials. Make sure that you do not use the two sources given in this assignment.

Prepare this assignment according to the guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center. An abstract is required.Benchmark - Curriculum Development Issue Paper

BUY A PLAGIARISM-FREE PAPER HERE

This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.

You are required to submit this assignment to Turnitin.


Benchmark - Curriculum Development Issue Paper 

  1
Not Submitted
0.00%
2
Unsatisfactory
75.00%
3
Less than Satisfactory
80.00%
4
Satisfactory
88.00%
5
Good
92.00%
6
Excellent
100.00%
100.0 %Content  
20.0 %Describe the selected issue/aspect of curriculum development None

Benchmark - Curriculum Development Issue Paper

Barely describes the selected issue/aspect of curriculum development. Significantly lacking in depth Minimally describes the selected issue/aspect of curriculum development. Lacks both scope and clarity Describes the selected issue/aspect of curriculum development. Description is lacking in scope or clarity Clearly describes the selected issue/aspect of curriculum development.Benchmark - Curriculum Development Issue Paper Clearly & comprehensively describes the selected issue/aspect of curriculum development
25.0 %Explore the selected issue and discuss its impact/relevance to nursing/staff or patient education. None Barely explores the selected issue and discuss its impact/relevance to nursing/staff or patient education. Significantly lacking in depth Minimally explores the selected issue and discuss its impact/relevance to nursing/staff or patient education. Lacks both scope and clarity  Benchmark - Curriculum Development Issue Paper Explores the selected issue and discuss its impact/relevance to nursing/staff or patient education. Discussion is lacking in scope or clarity Clearly explores the selected issue and discuss its impact/relevance to nursing/staff or patient education. Discussion does not address the impact/relevance comprehensively Clearly & comprehensively explores the selected issue and discuss its impact/relevance to nursing/staff or patient education.
25.0 %Propose strategies to resolve or solve the issue None Barely proposes strategies to resolve or solve the issue Minimally proposes strategies to resolve or solve the issue Proposes strategies to resolve or solve the issue Partially proposes strategies to resolve or solve the issue

Benchmark - Curriculum Development Issue Paper

Clearly & comprehensively proposes strategies to resolve or solve the issue
3.0 %Scholarly references Utilizes at least 3 scholarly, peer-reviewed resources less than 5 years old other in addition to course materials None

Benchmark - Curriculum Development Issue Paper

Selected literature is irrelevant & insufficient. Does not meet stated criteria. Does not use evidence-based sources when available. Uses only course materials Weak selection of sufficient & relevant literature (less than 5 years old) no scholarly, peer-reviewed references used - other than course materials) Uses only course materials Fair selection of sufficient & relevant literature (less than 5 years old)Benchmark - Curriculum Development Issue Paper at least 1 scholarly, peer-reviewed references used - other than course materials) Does not use evidence-based sources when available Partial selection of sufficient & relevant literature (less than 5 years old) at least 2 scholarly, peer-reviewed references used - other than course materials)Benchmark - Curriculum Development Issue Paper Uses evidence-based sources when available Excellent selection of sufficient & relevant literature (less than 5 years old) at least 3 scholarly, peer-reviewed references used - other than course materials) Uses evidence-based sources when available
2.0 %Length None Unacceptable adherence to assignment length criteria (less than or more than 50% of stated criteria) Poor adherence to assignment length criteria (within 50% of stated criteria)Benchmark - Curriculum Development Issue Paper Weak adherence to assignment length criteria (within 25 % of stated criteria) Adequate adherence to assignment length criteria (within 10% of stated criteria)Benchmark - Curriculum Development Issue Paper Excellent adherence to assignment length criteria (within stated criteria)
8.0 %Thesis Development and Purpose None Paper lacks any discernible overall purpose or organizing claim. Thesis and/or main claim are insufficiently developed and/or vague; purpose is not clear. Thesis and/or main claim are apparent and appropriate to purpose. Thesis and/or main claim are clear and forecast the development of the paper. It is descriptive and reflective of the arguments and appropriate to the purpose.Benchmark - Curriculum Development Issue Paper Thesis and/or main claim are comprehensive; contained within the thesis is the essence of the paper. Thesis statement makes the purpose of the paper clear.
7.0 %Paragraph Development and Transitions None Paragraphs and transitions consistently lack unity and coherence. No apparent connections between paragraphs are established.Benchmark - Curriculum Development Issue Paper Transitions are inappropriate to purpose and scope. Organization is disjointed. Some paragraphs and transitions may lack logical progression of ideas, unity, coherence, and/or cohesiveness. Some degree of organization is evident. Paragraphs are generally competent, but ideas may show some inconsistency in organization and/or in their relationships to each other.Benchmark - Curriculum Development Issue Paper A logical progression of ideas between paragraphs is apparent. Paragraphs exhibit a unity, coherence, and cohesiveness. Topic sentences and concluding remarks are appropriate to purpose. There is a sophisticated construction of paragraphs and transitions. Ideas progress and relate to each other. Paragraph and transition construction guide the reader. Paragraph structure is seamless.
5.0 %Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, language use) None Surface errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning. Inappropriate word choice and/or sentence construction are used.Benchmark - Curriculum Development Issue Paper Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader. Inconsistencies in language choice (register), sentence structure, and/or word choice are present. Some mechanical errors or typos are present, but are not overly distracting to the reader. Correct sentence structure and audience-appropriate language are used. Prose is largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may be present. A variety of sentence structures and effective figures of speech are used.Benchmark - Curriculum Development Issue Paper Writer is clearly in command of standard, written, academic English.
4.0 %APA Format None Correct APA format is not evident in the paper.Benchmark - Curriculum Development Issue Paper Correct APA format is infrequently used in the paper: cover page, margins, double-spacing, font size, and all other elements of APA. Correct APA format is inconsistently used in the paper: cover page, margins, double-spacing, and all other elements of APA.Benchmark - Curriculum Development Issue Paper Correct APA format is mostly used in the paper: cover page, margins, double-spacing, font size, and all other elements of APA. Correct APA format is consistently used in the paper: cover page, margins, double-spacing, font size, and all other elements of APA. Such as headings and pagination.
1.0 %Research Citations (In-text citations for paraphrasing and direct quotes, and reference page listing and formatting, as appropriate to assignment) None No reference page is included. No citations are used. Reference page is present. Citations are inconsistently used. Reference page is included and lists sources used in the paper. Benchmark - Curriculum Development Issue PaperSources are appropriately documented, although some errors may be present. Reference page is present and fully inclusive of all cited sources. Documentation is appropriate and GCU style is usually correct. In-text citations and a reference page are complete. The documentation of cited sources is free of error.
100 %Total Weightage Benchmark - Curriculum Development Issue Paper