Individual Critical Appraisal Essay

Individual Critical Appraisal Essay

Please read this over and complete the Critical Appraisal Guidelines. The purpose of this assignment is for you to understand the components of the research process and to evaluate a research study. This assignment is NOT to be conducted in your team.

Please locate the following article.

Williams, L., Eilers, J., Heermann, J., Smith, K. (2012). The lived experience of parents and guardians providing care for child transplant recipients. Progress in Transplantation, 22 (4), 393 – 402

Please read the above article. Using the Critical Appraisal Guidelines

(CAG ) ,
evaluate the article above.

Review the grading rubric. The grading rubric for the CAG presents components (the research process) that are presented in a research study.

The “Discussion Topic” provides you guidelines to use to evaluate the article listed above. Your textbook will assist you in evaluating each section of the CAG. Individual Critical Appraisal Essay.

The paper should be a scholarly paper following the guidelines set-forth in the Publication Manual of the American Psychological Association.

The questions should be answered completely with some reflection and thought. It is encouraged that you use other scholarly sources to provide support in your paper. When necessary, provide citations in the body of the text; yet do not cite every line. You should provide some of your own thought, insight, and analysis into the discussion.

The questions are not to be restated, but incorporated into an APA paper with headings, a title page, and a reference page.

BUY A PLAGIARISM-FREE PAPER HERE

Qualitative Critical Appraisal Exercise Rubric
This assignment requires you to read a research study (noted in the module) and evaluate it for the research process conducted by the authors. This assignment is worth 100 points (75 points for “Topics to be Discussed” and 25 points for “Scholarly Writing”. This assignment does not have a word/page minimum or limit. Your responsibilities include:
1. Locate (from the Library’s database) and print the research study.
2. Read the research study.Individual Critical Appraisal Essay.
3. Evaluate the research according to the rubric listed below. Use the text and lecture for appropriate research methods.
4. Topics to be Discussed and Scholarly Writing are expected to be represented in your paper.
5. Compose your paper. Use APA formatting. Submit your paper to Smarthinking for feedback prior to submitting your assignment to the appropriate drop box.
Excellent: 5 Points: Answer (s) are 100% correct
Average: 3 points: Answers (s) are 75% correct
Needs Improvement: 1 points: Answer (s) are 50 % correct
Not Acceptable: 0 points: Answers (s) are 25 % correct
Excellent
Average
A
Needs Improvement
Not Acceptable
No
Topics to be Discussed
5
3
1
0
Statement of the Problem
1. Discuss/describe the phenomenon of interest, problem, and or purpose (one paragraph).
Literature Review
2. Evaluate and explain the literature review presented in the research study. Does the literature review provide a strong support of evidence about the research problem? Please explain (one paragraph)Individual Critical Appraisal Essay.
Method
Protection of Participants Rights
3. Compare the recommended methods for protecting participants rights to what the researchers used in the study. Use you text book to find recommended methods for protecting participants. Please include in the discussion the topics of informed consents and use of an Institutional Review Board (one paragraph).
Research Design
4. Discuss characteristics of a qualitative design (please describe with a minimum of five supporting details).
5. Describe the design used in this study. Please include an analysis of the design and discuss if it is congruent with the design as described by your text. (Question 4 & 5 can be discussed in one paragraph)
Population and Sample
6. Discuss the population identified.
7. Define saturation. How is saturation achieved? Discuss how the author reached saturation. (Question 6 & 7 can be discussed in one paragraph)
Data Collection and Measurement
8. Discuss methods presented by Houser (2015) for data collection and measurement in qualitative research (please describe with a minimum of three supporting details)
9. Compare methods used for data collection and measurement by the author with methods presented by Houser (2015). (Question 8 & 9 can be discussed in one paragraph)
Result: Data Analysis/Rigor
10. Describe data analysis procedures for qualitative research (Please provide three supporting details)
11. Discuss the author’s data analysis procedures. Were the correct procedures conducted (Question 10 & 11 can be discussed in one paragraph)?
12. Did the author discuss trustworthiness of the data (and analysis)? How would trustworthiness be established?
13. What is triangulation? Did the author discuss triangulation (Question 12 & 13 can be discussed in one paragraph)?
Findings
14. Discuss the research findings. Did the author use tables and figures? Were they easy to understand? (one paragraph)
Discussion
Implications/Recommendations
15. Discuss the implications of the study for clinical practice or further research. Discuss how the research findings could contribute to nursing practice (one paragraph)
75 total points possible (25 questions worth 5 points each)
Scholarly Writing Requirements
APA Formatting: Title Page: Running head, title, author name, college, and page number. Body of Paper: Citations, use of headers (level one, two, and three)Individual Critical Appraisal Essay. Reference Page: Sources within the past 5 years.
*References are expected to be used in this paper. If citations are not used within the paper and/or the reference list is inconsistent when compared to citations in the paper, the grade may result in a “0” due to plagiarism. See Syllabus regarding Plagiarism. Please review plagiarism guidelines listed in the APA text.
Grammar,
Spelling/
Neatness
Uses correct grammar, spelling, and punctuation. 4 errors.
Uses correct grammar, spelling, and punctuation. 7 errors.
Uses some correct grammar, spelling, and punctuation. More than 10 errors.
Multiple grammar, spelling, and punctuation mistakes: More than 11 errors
Excellent
Average
Needs Improvement
Not Acceptable
Points Excellent: 5 points Average: 3 points Needs Improvement: 1 point Not Acceptable: 0 points 5 3 1 0
APA Title Page
Running head, title, author name, college, and page number. Less than two errors.
Running head, title, author name, college, and page number. Less than three errors.
Running head, title, author name, college, and page number. More than 4 errors.
Multiple errors on title page: More than 4 Individual Critical Appraisal Essay.
Points Excellent: 5 points Average: 3 points Needs Improvement: 1 point Not Acceptable: 0 points
APA Body of Paper
Body of Paper: Use level headers: one, two, and three. Citation/APA formatting correct. Less than 3 errors.
Body of Paper: Use level headers: one, two, and three. Citation/APA formatting correct. Less than 6 errors.
Body of Paper: Use level headers, one, two, and three. Citation/APA formatting correct. More than 6 errors.
Multiple errors: incorrect use of level of headers and no citation.
Points Excellent: 5 points Average: 3 points Needs Improvement: 1 point Not Acceptable: 0 points
Reference
Page .Individual Critical Appraisal Essay.
Reference page(s) follows APA formatting & all references are listed. At least one scholarly article along with a minimum of three references correctly cited. Less than 3 errors.
Reference page(s) following APA formatting & all references are listed. At least one scholarly article along with with a minimum of three references correctly cited. Less than 6 errors.
Reference page(s) following APA formatting & all references are listed. At least one scholarly article should be used, with a minimum of three references correctly cited. More than 6 errors.
No reference page.
Points Excellent: 5 points Average: 3 points Needs Improvement: 1 point Not Acceptable:Individual Critical Appraisal Essay 0 points
Critical Thinking
All Information clearly relates to the main topic, it includes several supporting details and/or examples. Enhances the critical thinking process throughout assignment by analyzing content and exploring alternatives/options.
75% of information clearly relates to the main topic, it includes several supporting details and/or examples. Enhances the critical thinking process throughout assignment by analyzing content and exploring alternatives/options.
50% of information clearly relates to the main topic, it includes several supporting details and/or examples. Enhances the critical thinking process throughout assignment by analyzing content and exploring alternatives/options. More than 6 errors.
Information does not relate to the topic and does not demonstrate thinking critically about the discussion topic.
Points Possible: Excellent: 5 points Average: 3 points Needs Improvement: 1 point Not Acceptable: 0 points
TOTAL:Individual Critical Appraisal Essay