NURS 5052 Week 4 Ethical Dimensions of Research Studies Discussion Paper

NURS 5052 Week 4 Ethical Dimensions of Research Studies Discussion Paper

In the best-selling book, The Immortal Life of Henrietta Lacks (Skloot, 2010), the author highlights the true story of an African-American woman who died in 1951 from cervical cancer. What makes her story unique is that prior to her death, cells from her tumor were removed and successfully grown in a petri dish. This was the first time scientists were able to successfully replicate cells outside the body, and it is estimated that billions of Lacks’ cells have been used in medical research. However, Henrietta Lacks was never asked for permission to take a sample and her family was never made aware of the widespread use of her cells. Although the culturing of her cells has been pivotal for advancing research, strong ethical concerns later arose about using these cells without patient or family approval. NURS 5052 Week 4 Ethical Dimensions of Research Studies Discussion Paper

BUY A PLAGIARISM-FREE PAPER HERE

This week’s readings describe historical examples of unethical research, such as a study of syphilis among African-American men in which treatment was withheld and a study in which live cancer cells were injected into elderly patients. Today, stricter controls that seek to protect study participants are placed on researchers, but breaches still occur. Careful attention must be given toward preventing unethical behavior. In this Discussion, you explore ethical considerations and issues in research. NURS 5052 Week 4 Ethical Dimensions of Research Studies Discussion Paper

To prepare:

• Select a current health-related case involving research ethics. (If none come to mind, browse the Internet to familiarize yourself with recent cases.)

• As you review the case that you have selected, reflect on the ethical principles discussed in “What Are the Major Ethical Issues in Conducting Research?” article found in this week’s Learning Resources. Which principles were breached in the case you have identified? NURS 5052 Week 4 Ethical Dimensions of Research Studies Discussion Paper

Post a description of the case that you selected and the ethical issues involved. Analyze the ethical principles that were breached by the researchers or organizations in your selected case as well as the possible cause of the breach(es). Suggest how the research might have been conducted differently to avoid or minimize the ethical problems. Discuss how research can be done on sensitive issues while still protecting the rights of the research subjects. NURS 5052 Week 4 Ethical Dimensions of Research Studies Discussion Paper

Rubric Detail

Select Grid View or List View to change the rubric's layout.

Content

Name: NURS_5052_Week_4_Discussion_Rubric

  Outstanding Performance Excellent Performance Competent Performance Proficient Performance Room for Improvement
Main Posting:
Response to the discussion question is reflective with critical analysis and synthesis representative of knowledge gained from the course readings for the module and current credible sources.
Points Range: 44 (44%) - 44 (44%)

Thoroughly responds to the discussion question(s)

is reflective with critical analysis and synthesis representative of knowledge gained from the course readings for the module and current credible sources. NURS 5052 Week 4 Ethical Dimensions of Research Studies Discussion Paper

supported by at least 3 current, credible sources

Points Range: 40 (40%) - 43 (43%)

Responds to the discussion question(s)

is reflective with critical analysis and synthesis representative of knowledge gained from the course readings for the module.

75% of post has exceptional depth and breadth

supported by at least 3 credible references. NURS 5052 Week 4 Ethical Dimensions of Research Studies Discussion Paper

Points Range: 35 (35%) - 39 (39%)

Responds to most of the discussion question(s)

is somewhat reflective with critical analysis and synthesis representative of knowledge gained from the course readings for the module.

50% of post has exceptional depth and breadth

supported by at least 3 credible references

Points Range: 31 (31%) - 34 (34%)

Responds to some of the discussion question(s)

one to two criteria are not addressed or are superficially addressed

is somewhat lacking reflection and critical analysis and synthesis

somewhat represents knowledge gained from the course readings for the module. NURS 5052 Week 4 Ethical Dimensions of Research Studies Discussion Paper

post is cited with fewer than 2 credible references

Points Range: 0 (0%) - 30 (30%)

Does not respond to the discussion question(s)

lacks depth or superficially addresses criteria

lacks reflection and critical analysis and synthesis

does not represent knowledge gained from the course readings for the module.

contains only 1 or no credible references

Main Posting:
Writing
Points Range: 6 (6%) - 6 (6%)

Written clearly and concisely

Contains no grammatical or spelling errors

Fully adheres to current APA manual writing rules and style. NURS 5052 Week 4 Ethical Dimensions of Research Studies Discussion Paper

Points Range: 5.5 (5.5%) - 5.5 (5.5%)NURS 5052 Week 4 Ethical Dimensions of Research Studies Discussion Paper

Written clearly and concisely

May contain one or no grammatical or spelling error

Adheres to current APA manual writing rules and style

Points Range: 5 (5%) - 5 (5%)

Written concisely

May contain one to two grammatical or spelling error

Adheres to current APA manual writing rules and style

Points Range: 4.5 (4.5%) - 4.5 (4.5%)

Written somewhat concisely

May contain more than two spelling or grammatical errors

Contains some APA formatting errors

Points Range: 0 (0%) - 4 (4%)

Not written clearly or concisely

Contains more than two spelling or grammatical errors

Does not adhere to current APA manual writing rules and style

Main Posting:
Timely and full participation
Points Range: 10 (10%) - 10 (10%)

Meets requirements for timely and full participation

posts main discussion by due date

Points Range: 0 (0%) - 0 (0%)

NA

Points Range: 0 (0%) - 0 (0%) NURS 5052 Week 4 Ethical Dimensions of Research Studies Discussion Paper

NA

Points Range: 0 (0%) - 0 (0%)

NA

Points Range: 0 (0%) - 0 (0%)

Does not meet requirement for full participation

First Response:

Post to colleague's main post that is reflective and justified with credible sources.

Points Range: 9 (9%) - 9 (9%)

Response exhibits critical thinking and application to practice settings

responds to questions posed by faculty

the use of scholarly sources to support ideas demonstrates synthesis and understanding of learning objectives

Points Range: 8.5 (8.5%) - 8.5 (8.5%) NURS 5052 Week 4 Ethical Dimensions of Research Studies Discussion Paper

Response exhibits critical thinking and application to practice settings

Points Range: 7.5 (7.5%) - 8 (8%)

Response has some depth and may exhibit critical thinking or application to practice setting

Points Range: 6.5 (6.5%) - 7 (7%)

Response is on topic, may have some depth. NURS 5052 Week 4 Ethical Dimensions of Research Studies Discussion Paper

Points Range: 0 (0%) - 6 (6%)

Response may not be on topic, lacks depth

First Response:
Writing
Points Range: 6 (6%) - 6 (6%)

Communication is professional and respectful to colleagues

Response to faculty questions are fully answered if posed . NURS 5052 Week 4 Ethical Dimensions of Research Studies Discussion Paper

Provides clear, concise opinions and ideas that are supported by two or more credible sources

Response is effectively written in Standard Edited English

Points Range: 5.5 (5.5%) - 5.5 (5.5%)

Communication is professional and respectful to colleagues

Response to faculty questions are answered if posed

Provides clear, concise opinions and ideas that are supported by two or more credible sources

Response is effectively written in Standard Edited English. NURS 5052 Week 4 Ethical Dimensions of Research Studies Discussion Paper

Points Range: 5 (5%) - 5 (5%)

Communication is mostly professional and respectful to colleagues

Response to faculty questions are mostly answered if posed

Provides opinions and ideas that are supported by few credible sources . NURS 5052 Week 4 Ethical Dimensions of Research Studies Discussion Paper

Response is written in Standard Edited English

Points Range: 4.5 (4.5%) - 4.5 (4.5%)

Responses posted in the discussion may lack effective professional communication

Response to faculty questions are somewhat answered if posed

Few or no credible sources are cited

Points Range: 0 (0%) - 4 (4%)

Responses posted in the discussion lack effective

Response to faculty questions are missing

No credible sources are cited

First Response:
Timely and full participation
Points Range: 5 (5%) - 5 (5%)

Meets requirements for timely and full participation

posts by due date

Points Range: 0 (0%) - 0 (0%) NURS 5052 Week 4 Ethical Dimensions of Research Studies Discussion Paper

NA

Points Range: 0 (0%) - 0 (0%)

NA

Points Range: 0 (0%) - 0 (0%)

NA

Points Range: 0 (0%) - 0 (0%)

Does not meet requirement for full participation

Second Response:
Post to colleague's main post that is reflective and justified with credible sources.
Points Range: 9 (9%) - 9 (9%)

Response exhibits critical thinking and application to practice settings * responds to questions posed by faculty

the use of scholarly sources to support ideas demonstrates synthesis and understanding of learning objectives

Points Range: 8.5 (8.5%) - 8.5 (8.5%)

Response exhibits critical thinking and application to practice settings. NURS 5052 Week 4 Ethical Dimensions of Research Studies Discussion Paper

Points Range: 7.5 (7.5%) - 8 (8%)

Response has some depth and may exhibit critical thinking or application to practice setting

Points Range: 6.5 (6.5%) - 7 (7%)

Response is on topic, may have some depth. NURS 5052 Week 4 Ethical Dimensions of Research Studies Discussion Paper

Points Range: 0 (0%) - 6 (6%)

Response may not be on topic, lacks depth

Second Response:
Writing
Points Range: 6 (6%) - 6 (6%)NURS 5052 Week 4 Ethical Dimensions of Research Studies Discussion Paper

Communication is professional and respectful to colleagues

Response to faculty questions are fully answered if posed

Provides clear, concise opinions and ideas that are supported by two or more credible sources

Response is effectively written in Standard Edited English

Points Range: 5.5 (5.5%) - 5.5 (5.5%)

Communication is professional and respectful to colleagues

Response to faculty questions are answered if posed

Provides clear, concise opinions and ideas that are supported by two or more credible sources

Response is effectively written in Standard Edited English

Points Range: 5 (5%) - 5 (5%)

Communication is mostly professional and respectful to colleagues

Response to faculty questions are mostly answered if posed

Provides opinions and ideas that are supported by few credible sources

Response is written in Standard Edited English. NURS 5052 Week 4 Ethical Dimensions of Research Studies Discussion Paper

Points Range: 4.5 (4.5%) - 4.5 (4.5%)

Responses posted in the discussion may lack effective professional communication

Response to faculty questions are somewhat answered if posed

Few or no credible sources are cited

Points Range: 0 (0%) - 4 (4%)

Responses posted in the discussion lack effective

Response to faculty questions are missing

No credible sources are cited

Second Response:
Timely and full participation
Points Range: 5 (5%) - 5 (5%)

Meets requirements for timely and full participation

Posts by due date

Points Range: 0 (0%) - 0 (0%) NURS 5052 Week 4 Ethical Dimensions of Research Studies Discussion Paper

NA

Points Range: 0 (0%) - 0 (0%)

NA

Points Range: 0 (0%) - 0 (0%)

NA

Points Range: 0 (0%) - 0 (0%)

Does not meet requirement for full participation

Total Points: 100 NURS 5052 Week 4 Ethical Dimensions of Research Studies Discussion Paper

Name: NURS_5052_Week_4_Discussion_Rubric

NURS 5052 Week 4 Ethical Dimensions of Research Studies Discussion Paper