Research article critique

Research article critique

Through this Research article critique assignment, the student will:

Critique a peer-reviewed study, and in your own words, describe the research question, sample, design of study, data collection method, findings, and limitations of each. (CO 1, CO2,)
Summarize the research article and evaluate the significance to nursing. Do not just quote the author\'s words. Paraphrase the information. (CO 4, CO5).
Guidelines to writing the Paper

BUY A PLAGIARISM-FREE PAPER HERE

Tips on how to complete this assignment may be found at http://www.brainshark.com/devry/vu?pi=zFmz5THHgzHr05z0&intk=406182077 (Links to an external site.)Links to an external site.
Download the Research Article Critique List of Articles (Links to an external site.)Links to an external site. and select ONE to analyze.
Retrieve the full-text version of the article from the library. Read it thoroughly.
Introduction (one paragraph): The introduction should be interesting and capture the reader\'s attention.
Provide a brief description of the research article to be discussed.
Discuss the purpose of your paper. The purpose statement of the paper should relate to the research article reviewed and the implications that it has to evidence based nursing practice.
You will need to summarize and analyze the information from the article in your own words
Describe the research question for this study in a paragraph. Research article critique.
Describe the research in greater detail.
Include your observations about this question.
Discuss events or trends that could have affected this question.
You will need to summarize and analyze the information from the article in your own words
Describe the research design of this study, and in your own words discuss the design.
Discuss the research design of the study.
Discuss the strengths and weaknesses of the type of design and hypothesize why the author utilized the design as opposed to others.
You will need to summarize the information from the article in your own words
Describe the sample.
Briefly describe the sample size used for this study
Make a judgment as to whether the sample size was adequate and defend your answer.
Describe the number or participants and determine if the number of participants was adequate compared to the research question and the intent of the study.
Are these numbers adequate? Discuss gaps in that you identified.
You will need to summarize and analyze the information from the article in your own words
Describe the data collection method(s)\' Research article critique.
Who collected the data?
What tools were used?
What were the ethical considerations addressed and discuss gaps you identified.
You will need to summarize and analyze the information from the article in your own words
Describe the limitations of the study.
Identify the limitations within the study
Describe how the limitations could be overcome in subsequent studies
Comment on why limitations are important to list and discuss within a study
You will need to summarize and analyze the information from the article in your own words
Describe the findings reported in the study.
Describe the findings reported in the study
Discuss whether the findings of the study answered the research question posed within the study
Discuss the credibility of the findings
If the findings do not support the research question posed within the study, what do you believe is the reason?
You will need to summarize and analyze the information from the article in your own words
Summary
Summarize important points from the body of your paper including the key components of the paper.
Include a statement about the research question and the findings.
Discuss the probability of implementation into practice. Based on these findings, is the evidence that you found on your topic strong enough to suggest a change in practice, or an idea for practice?
End with a concluding statement.

Cork, L. L. (2014). Nursing intuition as an assessment tool in predicting severity of injury in trauma patients. Journal of Trauma Nursing, 21(5), 244-252. doi:10.1097/JTN.0000000000000072
https://chamberlainuniversity.idm.oclc.org/login?url=http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ccm&AN=107832237&site=ehost-live&scope=site. Research article critique.

Research Article Critique Paper Rubric

Research Article Critique - Rubric

Criteria Ratings Pts
Research Question

(Describe, analyze, and summarize the research question for this study your own words.)

Fully describes, analyzes, and summarizes the research question in detail

20.0 pts

Generally, describes, and analyzes the research question.

18.0 pts

Briefly summarizes the research question, but omits some aspects of the question.

16.0 pts

Incorrectly describes the research question.

8.0 pts

Does not describe the research question.

0.0 pts

20.0 pts
Design of Study

(Describe, analyze, and summarize the research design of this study in your own words.)

Fully describes, analyzes, and summarizes the design of the study in detail.

20.0 pts

Generally, describes, and analyzes the design of the study.

18.0 pts

Briefly summarizes the design of the study, but omits some aspects of the design.

16.0 pts

Incorrectly describes the design of the study.

8.0 pts

Does not describe the design of the study.

0.0 pts

20.0 pts
Sample/Population of the Study

(Describe, analyze, and summarize the sample in your own words.) Research article critique

Fully describes, analyzes, and summarizes the sample used in the study in detail.

25.0 pts

Generally, describes, and analyzes the sample used in the study.

22.0 pts

Briefly summarizes the sample used in the study, but omits some details.

20.0 pts

Incorrectly describes the sample in the study, or omits major details

10.0 pts

Does not describe the sample used in the study.

0.0 pts

25.0 pts
Data Collection Methods

(Describe, analyze, and summarize the data collection method(s)’ in your own words.) Research article critique

Fully describes, analyzes, and summarizes all of the data collection methods used in the study.

25.0 pts

Generally, describes, and analyzes the majority of data collection methods used in the study.

22.0 pts

Briefly summarizes and describes parts of the data collection method used in the study.

20.0 pts

Incorrectly describes the data collection method used in the study. Research article critique

10.0 pts

Does not describe the data collection method used in the study.

0.0 pts. Research article critique

25.0 pts
Limitations

(Describe, analyze, and summarize the limitations of the study in your own words.)

Fully describes, analyzes, and summarizes the limitations found in the study in detail.

20.0 pts

Generally, describes, and analyzes the limitations found in the study.

18.0 pts

Briefly summarizes the limitations found in the study.

16.0 pts

Incorrectly describes the limitations found in the study.

8.0 pts

Does not describe the limitations found in the study.

0.0 pts

20.0 pts
Findings

(Describe, analyze, and summarize the findings reported in the study in your own words). Research article critique

Fully describes, analyzes, and summarizes the findings of the study in detail.

20.0 pts

Generally, describes, and analyzes the findings of the study.

18.0 pts

Briefly summarizes the findings of the study.

16.0 pts. Research article critique

Incorrectly identifies the findings from the study

8.0 pts

Does not describe the findings of the study.

0.0 pts

20.0 pts
Summary of Article

(Summarize important points from the body of your paper including the key components of the paper and discuss the probability of implementation into practice.). Research article critique

Summarizes study in detail and states specific rationale for whether a change in practice is warranted.

25.0 pts

Generally, summarizes study. Gives broad rationale for whether a change in practice is warranted.

22.0 pts

Briefly summarizes study and states rationale for whether a change in practice is warranted.

20.0 pts

Minimally summarizes study. Gives poor rationale for whether a change in practice is warranted.

10.0 pts

Does not summarize study and does not give rationale for whether a change in practice is warranted.

0.0 pts

25.0 pts
Grammar, Punctuation, and Spelling/ APA Formatting

(No errors in grammar, punctuation, spelling, and APA formatting.)

No errors in grammar, punctuation, APA, and spelling. Research article critique

20.0 pts

One to four errors in grammar, spelling.

18.0 pts

Five to eight errors in grammar, spelling, and syntax.

16.0 pts

Nine to twelve errors in grammar, spelling, and syntax. Research article critique

8.0 pts

Thirteen or more errors to the point where it is difficult to understand the meaning of the student’s writing.

0.0 pts

20.0 pts
Total Points: 175.0. Research article critique