The Personality Paradox Assignment Paper

The Personality Paradox Assignment Paper

Many theories and intervention techniques in performance psychology have a cognitive-behavioral approach. The interactional model of personality which describes behavior as the sum of personality (p), the environmental situation (s), and the interaction (i.e., Behavior = P + S + P x S) is generally a better predictor of success than the environmental situation or the personality alone. However, in many situations the environmental conditions are so influential that the stable personality characteristics will have little effect. This is known as the personality paradox. In this assignment, you will discuss the Cognitive Affective Processing System as a way of explaining both the personality paradox and how a performer's personality interacts with the environment to produce a behavioral response.The Personality Paradox Assignment Paper.

BUY A PLAGIARISM-FREE PAPER HERE

General Requirements:

Use the following information to ensure successful completion of the assignment:

  • Instructors will be using a grading rubric to grade the assignments. It is recommended that learners review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment in order to become familiar with the assignment criteria and expectations for successful completion of the assignment.
  • Doctoral learners are required to use APA style for their writing assignments. The APA Style Guide is located in the Student Success Center.The Personality Paradox Assignment Paper.
  • This assignment requires that at least two additional scholarly research sources related to this topic, and at least one in-text citation from each source be included.

Directions:

Write an essay (1,250-1,500 words) in which you will discuss the Cognitive Affective Processing System as a way of explaining both the personality paradox and how a performer's personality interacts with the environment to produce a behavioral response. In your paper, include the following:The Personality Paradox Assignment Paper.

  1. An explanation of how the personality paradox might occur.
  2. A discussion of the Cognitive Affective Processing System as a way of explaining the personality paradox.
  3. A discussion of the Cognitive Affective Processing System as a way of explaining how the performer's personality interacts with the environment.

Langner, R., & Eickhoff, S. B. (2012). Sustaining attention to simple tasks: A meta-analytic review of the neural mechanisms of vigilant attention. Psychological Bulletin. doi:10.1037/a0030694The Personality Paradox Assignment Paper.

URL:

https://lopes.idm.oclc.org/login?url=http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=pdh&AN=2012-30617-001&site=ehost-live&scope=site

Sanfey, A. G., Loewenstein, G., McClure, S. M., & Cohen, J. D. (2006). Neuroeconomics: Cross-currents in research on decision-making. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 10(3), 108-116.

URL:

https://lopes.idm.oclc.org/login?url=http://dx.doi.org.lopes.idm.oclc.org/10.1016/j.tics.2006.01.009

Course Code Class Code
PSY-831 PSY-831-O500 The Personality Paradox 190.0
Criteria Percentage Unsatisfactory (0.00%) Less Than Satisfactory (74.00%) Satisfactory (79.00%) Good (87.00%) Excellent (100.00%) Comments
Content 70.0%
Explanation of How the Personality Paradox Might Occur 20.0% An explanation of how the personality paradox might occur is either missing or not evident to the reader.The Personality Paradox Assignment Paper. An explanation of how the personality paradox might occur is present but incomplete or inaccurate. An explanation of how the personality paradox might occur is presented but is cursory and lacking in depth. The research used for support is outdated. An explanation of how the personality paradox might occur is thoroughly presented and includes a discussion of all necessary elements. The explanation is moderately well supported though some sources of support are outdated. An explanation of how the personality paradox might occur is thoroughly presented with rich detail and includes a discussion of all necessary elements. The explanation is well supported with current and/or seminal research.
Discussion of the Cognitive Affective Processing System as a Way of Explaining the Personality Paradox 20.0% A discussion of the Cognitive Affective Processing System as a way of explaining the personality paradox is either missing or not evident to the reader. A discussion of the Cognitive Affective Processing System as a way of explaining the personality paradox is present, but incomplete or inaccurate. A discussion of the Cognitive Affective Processing System as a way of explaining the personality paradox is present, but cursory. The research used for support is outdated. A discussion of the Cognitive Affective Processing System as a way of explaining the personality paradox is present and thorough. The discussion is moderately well supported though some sources of support are outdated. A discussion of the Cognitive Affective Processing System as a way of explaining the personality paradox is present, thorough, and well-detailed. The discussion is well supported with current and/or seminal research.
Discussion of the Cognitive Affective Processing System as a Way of Explaining How the Performer's Personality Interacts with the Environment 20.0% A discussion of the Cognitive Affective Processing System as a way of explaining how the performer's personality interacts with the environment is either missing or not evident to the reader.The Personality Paradox Assignment Paper. A discussion of the Cognitive Affective Processing System as a way of explaining how the performer's personality interacts with the environment is present, but incomplete or inaccurate.The Personality Paradox Assignment Paper A discussion of the Cognitive Affective Processing System as a way of explaining how the performer's personality interacts with the environment is present, but cursory. The research used for support is outdated. A discussion of the Cognitive Affective processing system as a way of explaining how the performer's personality interacts with the environment is present and thorough. The discussion is moderately well supported though some sources of support are outdated. A discussion Of the Cognitive Affective Processing System as a way of explaining how the performer's personality interacts with the environment is present, thorough, and well-detailed. The discussion is well supported with current and/or seminal research.
Synthesis and Argument 10.0% No synthesis of source information is evident. Statement of purpose is not followed to a justifiable conclusion. The conclusion does not support the claim made. Argument is incoherent and uses non-credible sources. The Personality Paradox Assignment Paper. Synthesis of source information is attempted, but is not successful. Sufficient justification of claims is lacking. Argument lacks consistent unity. There are obvious flaws in the logic. Some sources have questionable credibility. Synthesis of source information is present, but pedantic. Argument is orderly, but may have a few inconsistencies. The argument presents minimal justification of claims. Argument logically, but not thoroughly, supports the purpose. Sources used are credible. Introduction and conclusion bracket the thesis. Synthesis of source information is present and meaningful. Argument shows logical progressions. Techniques of argumentation are evident. There is a smooth progression of claims from introduction to conclusion. Most sources are authoritative. Synthesis of source information is present and scholarly. Argument is clear and convincing presenting a persuasive claim in a distinctive and compelling manner. All sources are authoritative. The synthesis and argument in the paper are of publication caliber.
Organization and Effectiveness 20.0%
Thesis Development and Purpose 20.0% Paper lacks any discernible overall purpose or organizing claim.The Personality Paradox Assignment Paper. Thesis and/or main claim are insufficiently developed and/or vague; purpose is not clear. Thesis and/or main claim are apparent and appropriate to purpose. Thesis and/or main claim are clear and forecast the development of the paper. They are descriptive and reflective of the arguments and appropriate to the purpose. Thesis and/or main claim are clear and comprehensive; the essence of the paper is contained within the thesis. The development indicated by the thesis and/or main claim is acceptable for publication.
Format 10.0%
Mechanics of Writing 5.0% Mechanical errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning. Inappropriate word choice and/or sentence construction are used.The Personality Paradox Assignment Paper. Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader. Inconsistencies in language choice (register), sentence structure, and/or word choice are present. Some mechanical errors or typos are present, but are not overly distracting to the reader. Correct sentence structure and audience-appropriate language are used. Prose is largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may be present. A variety of sentence structures and effective figures of speech are used. Writer is clearly in command of standard, written, academic English.
APA Format 5.0% Required format is rarely followed correctly. An appropriate number of topic-related scholarly research sources and related in-text citations is not present. No reference page is included. No citations are used.The Personality Paradox Assignment Paper. Required format is attempted, but some elements are missing or mistaken. A lack of control with formatting is apparent. Some included sources are not scholarly research or topic-related. Reference page is present. Citations are inconsistently used. Required format is used correctly, although some minor errors may be present. Scholarly research sources are present and topic-related, but the source and quality of some references is questionable. Reference page is included and lists sources used in the paper. Sources are appropriately documented, although some errors may be present. Required format is fully used. There are virtually no errors in formatting style. Scholarly research accounts for the majority of sources presented and is topic-related and obtained from reputable professional sources. Reference page is present and fully inclusive of all cited sources. Documentation is appropriate and citation style is usually correct. The document is correctly formatted to publication standards. All research presented is scholarly, topic-related, and obtained from highly respected, professional, original sources. In-text citations and a reference page are complete and correct. The documentation of cited sources is free of error. The paper could readily be accepted for publication.

The Personality Paradox Assignment Paper